The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) issued to the MAP
Pharmaceuticals' US Patent No. 8,119,639, titled "Method of Therapeutic
Administration of DHE to Enable Rapid Relief of Migraine while
Minimizing Side Effect Profile."
Showing posts with label IPR. Show all posts
Showing posts with label IPR. Show all posts
Monday, 27 February 2012
Thursday, 9 February 2012
Scope, Implications of Section 3(d) Of the Indian Patents Act, 1970 (As Amended)
Under Indian patent law, there are
certain inventions which are deemed specifically not patentable.
These are identified in Section 3, and the
sub-clause of that section which is relevant with respect to the infamous Novartis case
pending before the Chennai High Court and now also IPAB [Intellectual
Property Appellate Board] is sub-clause (d) of Section 3.
Monday, 6 February 2012
Natco Pharma files India's first compulsory license plea
Natco
Pharma has applied for the country's first compulsory licence to sell a generic
version of Bayer's patented medicine, a development whose outcome is expected
to determine how global drug makers price their costly drugs in India.
In compulsory licensing, the government allows a generic firm to produce a patented product without the consent of the patent owner. It is one of the flexibilities on patent protection included in the WTO's agreement on intellectual property -TRIPS (trade-related aspects of intellectual property rights) Agreement.
In compulsory licensing, the government allows a generic firm to produce a patented product without the consent of the patent owner. It is one of the flexibilities on patent protection included in the WTO's agreement on intellectual property -TRIPS (trade-related aspects of intellectual property rights) Agreement.
Facts: Indian Pharma Import
S.NO
|
COUNTRIES
|
APR 2004-
MAR 2005
(RS.
CRORES)
|
APRIL 2005
– MAR 2006
(RS.
CRORES)
|
1
|
China P Rp
|
908.57
|
1563.53
|
2
|
Switzerland
|
375.44
|
547.35
|
3
|
U S A
|
298.11
|
425.32
|
4
|
Germany
|
188.82
|
276.33
|
5
|
Denmark
|
107.48
|
174.48
|
10 largest U.S. patent losses
In the drug business, exclusivity is everything. Once a branded drug gets generic competition, pricing power fades and sales slowly drain away, leaving drugmakers dependent on the next new thing. It's all very reasonable in theory, but when the drugs losing patent protection are the biggest in the business--and they're all falling off patent around the same time--even the most rational companies can get a bit panicky.
Welcome to the patent cliff, the most influential feature of today's pharma landscape. Here, so many drugs are falling off patent that the path forward has twisted, and the entire industry is looking to find its way. Some companies, such as Pfizer and Merck, have merged with major rivals. Others have snapped up acquisitions in ancillary businesses, such as generics and over-the-counter medicines, and expanded into countries they previously ignored. Still others have forged ahead, betting that they'd manage to develop enough new products to make up the difference.
Welcome to the patent cliff, the most influential feature of today's pharma landscape. Here, so many drugs are falling off patent that the path forward has twisted, and the entire industry is looking to find its way. Some companies, such as Pfizer and Merck, have merged with major rivals. Others have snapped up acquisitions in ancillary businesses, such as generics and over-the-counter medicines, and expanded into countries they previously ignored. Still others have forged ahead, betting that they'd manage to develop enough new products to make up the difference.
Thursday, 2 February 2012
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)